Thursday

Pakistan & Private Equity


The Sardar Law Firm recently analyzed a prospective alternative energy joint venture between a North American company and a public-private partner in Pakistan on behalf of a consultancy. The firm analyzed the creation and sustainability of a JV; financing through private equity structures; foreign exchange hedging; and agro-energy economic factors relevant to the project in Pakistan.

The current fiscal crisis has least affected private equity funding, which bears positively on international project financing in emerging markets. Emerging markets private equity will continue to present attractive investment opportunities this year. Recent EM-PE funds will likely outperform equally developed market funds because of a lower reliance on debt-to-finance transactions despite general economic decline. Still, the average risk premium for EM-PE has risen to 7.2% from 6.7% in 2008. Over three quarters of investors (78%) currently invested in EM-PE plan to commit additional EM managers and/or geographies over the next 5 years. Further, nearly two-thirds of investors (62%) with current exposure to EM-PE expect the dollar value of their new commitments to remain steady or rise in 2009 relative to their actual commitments in 2008. Merely 26% of investors who intend to reduce commitments are doing so to refocus on developed markets. Of the investors who do not have exposure to EM-PE, over 35% expect to commit to private equity investing within the next 12-to-24 months.

With the private equity market relatively healthy for current and new investment, Pakistan and other emerging economies have seen an increase in project financing. Any prospective investor or project developer however, should seek legal counsel when navigating the complex international regulatory terrain covering equity, financing, government approval, and project implementation.

Tuesday

Debt Collection: What Consumers Need to Know


With layoffs on the rise, it is a wonder that credit card companies are sending more and more pre-approved credit card applications out in order to garner more customers. These credit cards are often available with high interest rates or other variable terms and conditions. Consumers use the credits cards in hard times because - frankly - they often lack a choice due to difficult financial situations.


However, the problems start when individuals fall behind on credit card payments or when the creditor's records mistakenly show that they have fallen behind, and start phone calls from debt collectors start coming in. Consumers are often overwhelmed by these calls and have no idea what to do.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which prohibits debt collectors from using abusive, unfair, or deceptive debt collection practices. The FDCPA covers personal, family, and household debts, including money owed on a personal credit card account, an auto loan, a medical bill, and/or mortgage.


Under the FDCPA, a debt collector is someone who regularly collects debts owed to others. This includes collection agencies, lawyers who collect debts on a regular basis, and companies that buy delinquent debts and then try to collect them. Here are some actions that debt collectors may NOT engage in the following practices, as outlined by the FTC:


(1) Harassment. Debt collectors may not harass, oppress, or abuse individuals or any third parties they contact.

(2) False statements. Debt collectors may not lie when they are trying to collect a debt.

(3) Debt collectors are prohibited from saying:

  • you will be arrested if you don’t pay your debt;
  • they’ll seize, garnish, attach, or sell your property or wages unless they are permitted by law to take the action and intend to do so; or
  • legal action will be taken against you, if doing so would be illegal or if they don’t intend to take the action.

Often, debt collectors utilize these tactics because consumers are not represented by a lawyer. Further, many violations committed by debt collectors are technical violations that may not be readily apparent. However, it is imperative for individuals to know their rights, and know that they contact a lawyer for further advice.

Islamic Finance & Investment: The Next Wave

With the legal market saturated with lawyers in every conceivable practice area, from corporate to litigation, there are few opportunities to distinguish one's own practice. Islamic finance however, is gaining ground as a mainstream vehicle for individual and institutional investments, mergers, property development and acquisitions. Islamic finance refers to principles of funding and investment based on the Shari'ah, a corpus of rules derived from The Qur'an, Islam's holy text. Islamic finance is known as Fiqh al-Muamalat (Islamic rules on transactions). The basic principle of Islamic banking is the sharing of profit and loss and the prohibition of riba (usury). Common Islamic concepts are profit sharing (Mudharabah), safekeeping (Wadiah), joint venture (Musharakah), cost plus (Murabahah), and leading (Ijarah). In sum, Shari'ah compliance typically relates to the prohibition on interest as security in the future event of financial delay or default.

To circumvent the use of interest, Shari'ah-compliant transactions have found innovative ways to finance. For example, in an Islamic mortgage transaction, instead of loaning the buyer money to purchase the real estate, a bank may purchase the real estate from the seller, and re-sell it to the buyer at a profit, while allowing the buyer to pay the bank in installments. In this context, there are no additional penalties for late payment and therefore, no use of interest arises. In order to protect itself against default, the bank asks for strict collateral. The real estate is registered to the name of the buyer from the start of the transaction, called Murabahah.

Another innovative approach applied to real estate loans is called Musharaka al-Mutanaqisa, which enables banks to institute a floating rate in the form of rental. The bank and borrower forms a partnership entity, both providing capital at an agreed percentage to purchase the property. The partnership entity then rents out the property to the borrower and charges rent. The bank and the borrower will then share the proceed from this rent based on the current equity share of the partnership. Concurrently, the borrower in the partnership entity also buys the bank's share on the property at agreed installments until the full equity is transferred to the borrower and the partnership ceases to exist. If default occurs, both the bank and the borrower receive the proceeds from an auction based on the current equity. This method allows for floating rates according to current market rate such as the BLR (base lending rate).

There are a variety of emerging, more complex financial arrangements that call for the application of Islamic legal principles. As Western and Islamic institutions grow in their financial ventures, U.S. lawyers should keep apprised of its developments and potential income opportunities.

Severance Pressure: Not Everyone has to Accept the Terms

With lay offs being heard around the world, employees are being faced with tough choices: take the usually attractive severance package or to walk away and leave options open against their former employers. These choices are hardly novel, however, the situations in which they arise are novel because of the economy. Companies are putting intense pressure on their former employees to sign severance agreements.


A couple of days ago we received a call from an employee because her employer had given her one day to sign the severance agreement or face immediate termination and no severance. However, the agreement itself stated that she had 21 days to review it and advised that she retain a lawyer to review it. We stepped in right away and the situation was resolved.


With the economy being volatile and employers feeling the need to clear out employees, these tactics are not unheard of. But, individuals need to think about what to do if they are faced with such a situation.


Remember:


- If the agreement gives you a deadline, your employer must abide by that deadline. They cannot force you to make a decision before that deadline occurs. It is a written promise and they must uphold it.


- Review the entire agreement. Find an employment or contract lawyer that can help you understand the terms of the agreement, discuss other options, and advise you accordingly.


- Sign the agreement once you have understood the terms and are ready to move forward with your course of action.


- DO NOT feel pressured. Severance agreements are an OPTION, not a requirement.


- It is a contract. Remember, it can be negotiated withe your employer. You may be able to ask for more money or extended benefits.